The Real History Of World War 2

In discussing World War 3 it’s of import to understand World War 2. In the Empire of Lies nothing is…
1 Min Read 0 2

In discussing World War 3 it’s of import to understand World War 2.

In the Empire of Lies nothing is as it seems.

Neville Chamberlain was not appeasing Hitler. He was trying to get from the “bad war” (with Germany) to the “good war” against the Soviet Union. It’s almost an injustice against Chamberlain that he is portrayed as a sap hoping for peace when he was actually preparing for war against the Soviet Union.

This is propaganda after the fact – the idea Chamberlain was some poor sap trying to get peace and “non-intervention”.

As Stalin stated:

“Even more characteristic is the fact that certain European and American politicians and pressmen, having lost patience waiting for “the march on the Soviet Ukraine,” are themselves beginning to disclose what is really behind the policy of non-intervention.

They are saying quite openly, putting it down in black and white, that the Germans have cruelly “disappointed” them, for instead of marching farther east against the Soviet Union, they have turned, you see, to the west and are demanding colonies.

One might think that the districts of Czechoslovakia were yielded to Germany as the price of an undertaking to launch war on the Soviet Union, but that now the Germans are refusing to meet their bills and are sending them to Hades.”1

The truth is that Chamberlain helped Hitler and a significant portion, mostly lead by Lord Halifax and the King, wanted a war against the Soviet union not the Hilerites.

Who can forget our beloved Queen sieg heiling?

Operation Pike

Operation Pike was a 1940 operation planned to bomb Soviet oil fields. British spy planes were surveying bombing targets in the Soviet Union as late as May 1940. This was during the Phoney War when Britain had already declared war against Nazi Germany in September 1939. The Chamberlain faction – those who wanted war against the Soviet Union – were desperate to steer this war toward the Soviet Union and away from Nazi Germany.

Similarly, the flight of Rudolph Hess, the Deputy Furher to Scotland and his attempt to land on Lord Halifaxs estate was a Hail Mary pass to stop the war on Nazi Germany and reorient the war toward the Soviet Union. This pro-fascist sentiment was particularly strong in Britain. Consider the Stone that was erected in Scotland to the “memory” of Rudolph Hess

“This Stone marks the spot where brave, heroic Rudophl Hess landed by parachute on the night of 10th May 1941 seeking to end the war between Britain and Germany.”

World War 2 Was A Fight Over Who Got To Own What Colonies – As Lord Halifax and Hitler Prove In Conversation

Of course the bourgeois rightists, who claim to be nationalists, but in fact trend to bourgeois cosmopolitanism and the maintenance of Global capitalism. The real history of World War 2 was a fight over who got to own what colonies. As a conversation between Lord Halifax and Adolf Hitler shows.

“It was a fact that some nations had not sufficient living space. If England with her 46 million in¬habitants had to live solely off the home country, it would perhaps be easier for her to understand this. The prejudiced attitude toward the colonial question entirely came from the fact that it was considered self-understood that America and Russia should possess great territories, that England should own one-quarter of the world, that France should have a colonial empire and that Japan should at least not be prevented from expanding. It was also considered self-understood that little countries like Belgium, Spain and Portugal should have colonies.

“Only Germany was told that under no circumstances must she have colonies.

“That characterized the attitude of the parties which, like the Conservatives in England, had taken an absolutely negative stand on the colonial question. What was the sense of inviting a country to positive co-operation, when in other matters it was denied the most primitive rights?”2

As well as blocking Communism.

Lord Halifax in a discussion with Adolf Hitler

“In spite of the difficulties he (Lord Halifax) and other members of the British Government were fully aware that the Fuhrer has not only achieved a great deal inside Germany herself, but that, by destroying Communism in his country, he had barred its road to Western Europe, and that Germany therefore could rightly be regarded as a bulwark of the West against Bolshevism.”3

Communism is practically the only method to keeping your country safe from transnational imperialism. Those that live in Capitalist countries can expect mass migration as a phenomena to bring down wages. A degradation of their culture in favour of the lowest common denominator slop poured out like poison from Hollywood.

The Soviet Offer Of an Anti-Nazi Pact Prior To The Molotov Ribbentrop Pact

The Soviets always maintained that they were trying to seek a peace arrangement and anti-Nazi pact among the Western Capitalist countries. Indeed the Soviets had a Franco-Soviet pact in defence of Czechoslovakia. The French tore this up in 1938 with the Munich Agreement. The Czechoslovak President also stated of the pact that it could be turned into an Anti-Communist crusade if the Soviets came to Czechoslovakias defence. The mechanism being that if the Soviets came to Czech aid but the French did not – the imperialist pigs would then claim that the Soviet Union was enacting an aggression needing to be repulsed.

Here he was clearly referring to the ruling class in Britain and elsewhere on the European continent.

The Soviets offered the British an Anti-Nazi pact one week before signing Molotov Ribbentrop pact. A fact even the British press admitted in 2008 when the 70 year clearance of British government documents proved the Soviets were the ones telling the truth.

Operation Unthinkable

Operation Unthinkable was a precursor to the Cold War to rearm the Werhmacht and invade the Soviet Union. Churchill threatened to nuclear strike each city in Russia until the Soviets gave up and allowed a global occupation force over Moscow. This was turned down by the Americans who had a monopoly on Nuclear weapons but shows the thinking of the British bourgeoisie and Churchills demand to “smother bolshevism in its crib” at the cost of a nuclear holocaust.

Operation Gladio

Operation Unthinkable would eventually morph into NATO’s Operation Gladio. By arming fascists all across Europe to ensure the continent was safe for global capitalism during the Cold War. The CIA armed and funded Gladio groups across Europe massacred innocents and the scary Communist Soviet Union was used as an example to justify their terrorism. They murdered 80+ people in the Bologna Train station massacre as well as thousands over a protracted period.

One of the Gladio terrorists appeared on a BBC documentary in the early 1990s to explain the Strategy of Tension that NATO was implementing to secure it’s rule over Europe.

“You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children. Innocent people outside the political arena.

“For one simple reason: To force the Italian public to turn to the State. Turn to the regime and ask for greater security. This was precisely the role of the Right in Italy”.4

World War 3 is Already Underway And Global Famine is on the Horizon

The great lie of the 20th century is that the rift between the anti-civilisation West and the Communist Bloc was a war over ideology.

Over Communism.

It was always over routes and resources. The Russian Federation today still stands as a barrier to Capitals total rule despite the ruling governments slavish misteps towards the West.5

Before World War 2 was even over the British government, led by Churchill, wanted to ally with the Werhmacht against the Soviet Union. The Cold War was a brief pause in the war where the Communist bloc was strong enough to prevent Western governments selling arms to insane Ukrainian Banderites who would fire missiles into Russian cities.

Tucker Carlson and Jacob Resse-Mog Expose The Truth

Recently Tucker and Jacob Resse-Mog sat in the home of reese-Mog and asked the question “Had Britain actually gained anything by fighting Hitler?”

The former British minister rebounded the usual answer any British schoolboy knows. “Without winning we’d be speaking German”.

Tucker responded, “Who cares? There are a lot of people in Britain who can’t speak English.”

The outrage against Tucker was predictable. Little of course was said of Britains role in starting World War 2. The appeasement of Hitler by Chamberlain was not appeasement as the British lying Liberals like to retell this episode and which has already been disproved by Operation Pike mentioned above.

The British involvement in World War 2 was the recruitment of Mussolini by Mi6, the bringing of the Hitlerites to power as the German banking collapse of 1930 was organised by J P Morgan and Norman Montagu of the Bank Of England.

“By May 13, 1931, the fuse was ready for the torch. On that day, the large Vienna Creditanstalt collapsed. The French had decided to “punish” Austria for entering into customs union talks with Germany by imposing currency sanctions. Creditanstalt was a Rothschild bank with heavy ties to French banking. As French funds were recalled from Austria, this toppled the fragile Creditanstalt, the largest Austrian bank, which had large interests in some 70 per cent of Austria’s industry. To attempt to stop the run on the Creditanstalt, Austrian banks called in all funds they had in German banks. Creditanstalt was the weak link which started the domino collapse of banking throughout central Europe.

“The ensuing banking crisis, economic depression and the related tragic developments in Austria and Germany were dictated virtually to the letter by Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, the governor of the New York Federal Reserve, George Harrison, and the house of Morgan and friends in Wall Street. A decision had been made to cut all credits to Germany, though even a minimal roll-over of nominally small sums would probably have stopped the crisis from erupting out of control at this early stage.

“Instead, capital began to flow out of Germany in ever greater amounts. On the demand of Montagu Norman and George Harrison, a new Reichsbank President, Hans Luther, dutifully abstained from doing anything to stop the collapse of the large German banks.”6

The refusal of British and American banks to loan to the fledgling German social democrats until Hitler came to power at that point they gave credit to the Hitlerites which built their “economic revival” based on a war economy.7

So much for the favourite Rightist lie “if it were not for Communism in Russia the Hitlerites would never have existed!”8

It was to drag the entire world into war, let everyone exhaust themselves against each other whilst standing on the side and then come in and declare victory.

“The chief reason is that the majority of the non-aggressive countries, particularly England and France, have rejected the policy of collective security, the policy of collective resistance to the aggressors, and have taken up a position of non-intervention, a position of “neutrality.”

“Formally speaking, the policy of non-intervention might be defined as follows: “Let each country defend itself from the aggressors as it likes and as best it can. That is not our affair. We shall trade both with the aggressors and with their victims.” But actually speaking, the policy of non-intervention means conniving at aggression, giving free rein to war, and, consequently, transforming the war into a world war.

“The policy of non-intervention reveals an eagerness, a desire, not to hinder the aggressors in their nefarious work: not to hinder Japan, say, from embroiling herself in a war with China, or, better still, with the Soviet Union; to allow all the belligerents to sink deeply into the mire of war, to encourage them surreptitiously in this, to allow them to weaken and exhaust one another; and then, when they have become weak enough, to appear on the scene with fresh strength, to appear, of course, “in the interests of peace,” and to dictate conditions to the enfeebled belligerents.

“Cheap and easy!”9

The Russians having abandoned socialism have found themselves in the crosshairs of the West again. The convergence of Germany and the Anglo-American powers has happened again and this time aiming to carve up Russia as a country.

Halder described in his diary a meeting in 1941 a total war of extermination in the East and a gentlemen’s war in the West.

Clash of two ideologies. Crushing denunciation of Bolshevism, identified with asocial criminality. Communism is an enormous danger for our future. We must forget the concept of comradeship between soldiers. A Communist is no comrade before nor after the battle. This is a war of extermination. If we do not grasp this, we shall still beat the enemy, but 30 years later we shall again have to fight the Communist foe. We do not wage war to preserve the enemy.

“Future political [configuration] of Russia?

“Northern Russia goes to Finland. Protectorates: Baltic States, Ukraine, White Russia.

“War against Russia?

“[Destruction] of the Bolshevist Commissars and of the Intelligentsia. The new states must be Socialist, but without intellectual classes of their own. The formation of a new intellectual class must be prevented. A primitive Socialist intelligentsia is all that is needed. We must fight against the poison of disintegration. This is no job for Military Courts. The individual troop commanders must know the issues at stake… They must be leaders in this fight. The troops must fight back with the methods with which they are attacked. Commissars and GPU men are criminals and must be dealt with as such. This need not mean that the troops should get out of hand. Rather, the commander must give orders which express the common feelings of his men.

“Embody in [orders]:

“This war will be very different from the war in the West.”

ObdH Order

“In the East, harshness today means lenience in the future. Commanders must make the sacrifice of overcoming their personal scruples.”

The debate between Tucker and Jacob Reese-Mogg shows it is a debate between family. An Englishman, An American and the Germans. For every Briton lost in World War 2 the Soviet Union lost sixty people.

The price of the British in World War 2 would have been speaking German. The price of the Soviet peoples would have been ceasing to exist.

Indeed when we look around Britain today it looks like we lost a war! Our children are barely literate. Reading is old hat. We’re surrounded in American technology that dumbs down the population. The Americans have flooded pornography everywhere to distract the minds of the masses.

The Economist celebrates Bonnie Blue, a pornographer that preys on young men.

Our industries are in shambles. The Thatcherites dynamited our coal mines and made us dependent on floating gas markets. Our railways and water were sold to foreigners.

Our young aren’t having children and the British government, like Boris Johnson brought in the Boris Wave (1 million migrants) import masses of labour as the price of commodity, labour power began to rise

“The treasury basically believed the labour market was seizing up (IE. workers able to barter for better wages with their bourgeois owners!!) and people couldn’t get a pair of hands to do the jobs they needed done.” (Boris Johnson).

We indeed lost a war!

A Class war!

And for an American to sit on high telling us “we should’ve sided with Germany” is remarkable given the deep penetration of American capital that has essentially made the British people a slave to American capitalism.10

It is also a false dichotomy.

If we’re going to imagine different futures why not imagine a world instead where Britain had had it’s socialist revolution and sided with the Soviet Union against the axis as well as the eugenicist Americans.

The parasitical nature of the finance Capital would’ve been dealt one of the heaviest of blows. British Socialism would’ve provided housing, employment and productive jobs for everyone.

Instead of a Real Estate, Finance and Insurance economy where desperate migrants deliver food on bikes to people in Finance whilst rent is £1500+ a month.

Engaged in real economy we would not have a culture of death.

The endless wars of American imperialism would’ve been practically impossible if Britain had stood as an independent, sovereign Socialist nation instead of an unsinkable aircraft carrier for the United States.

REFERENCES

1 J V Stalin, Works vol 14, p368

2 DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS RELATING TO THE EVE OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR, p28,

3 Ibid, p19-20

4 BBC TimeWatch, Operation Gladio, 1992, https://odysee.com/@skrussellak:e/Operation-Gladio—BBC-Timewatch-(1992):3

5 Putin advanced that he had been “led by the nose again” by the imperialist West. As if the West had any shred of honour and wasn’t waging a war of centuries long timeline against destroying the Russian people so they can access the natural resources and return the Russian peoples to a slave existence like the 1990s all over again.

6 F William Engdahl, A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, p79

7 See F William Engdahl, A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, p76-p84 for this sordid episode of history

8 Refuting this Rightist talking point also ignores the fact the Rockefellers and Carnegie from USA were the ones to export the bourgeois-pseudo science of “race science” and eugenics to Germany.

9 Joseph Stalin, Collected Works Vol 14, p365-366, https://bannedthought.net/USSR/Stalin/Works/Stalin-Works-14-RedStar.pdf

10 See Angus Hanton, Vassal State, How America Runs Britain, 2024 for a deep investigation to the extent of British Capital owning Britain.

LighthouseML

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *