
A Ukrainian Woman Pleads a Conscription Officer not to take her husband. A still from a recent video in Ukraine as the Banderites, psychotic servants of international Capitalism, wage war on their own people. This scene could be coming to Britain thanks to the psychos and paid off whores of Capital that run the British state.
Ukraine is a Fascist government. The leading figures in Ukraine are the progeny of Stepan Bandera and the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists and the UPA. The Banderites have little regard for their Ukrainian brethren. They’ve always seen them as expendable.
The entire NATO occupied Capitalist countries have followed a similar pattern. You demonise a country as the new “Hitler”. You then frame any nuance of argument or negotiation with the demonised country as “Neville Chamberlain” appeasement.
They have done this with every successful war they’ve ever waged. Including the complete destruction of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Again in Iraq. They did this with Libya and the lion of Africa, Muammar Guadaffi. And they increasingly started to do this Russia and Putin after his 2007 Munich Security Speech.
As Ever inside the the empire of lies almost none of this is true.
British Conscription
The British press is now full of articles about “severe punishments” for Brits refusing conscription.
You’d do well to remember all the chancers, agents of the State and grifters that have insisted for years that the “British army can’t fight a war”, that you could “fit the entire armed forces in a whatever Stadium” or that it’d be “impossible to move to a Total War scenario.”
We were in a “Phoney War” scenario with Germany from Sept 1939 to June 1940 where people were insisting we weren’t “really at war with Germany”.
The day Britain declared War was the day conscription was brought in
Full conscription of men
On the day Britain declared war on Germany, 3 September 1939, Parliament immediately passed a more wide-reaching measure.
The National Service (Armed Forces) Act imposed conscription on all males aged between 18 and 41 who had to register for service. Those medically unfit were exempted, as were others in key industries and jobs such as baking, farming, medicine, and engineering.
Conscientious objectors had to appear before a tribunal to argue their reasons for refusing to join-up. If their cases were not dismissed, they were granted one of several categories of exemption, and were given non-combatant jobs.
Conscription helped greatly to increase the number of men in active service during the first year of the war. 1We see the order of things as they happen: a War is declared then conscription and the building for armaments begins. Under such conditions the meagre civil rights that have been attained under Capitalist conditions are swept into the bin and mass campaigns to force men to die in ditches become rule of law for global Capitalism.
White Feather Campaign – Bourgeois Feminists “Shame” Brits For Not Wanting To Die For Global Capitalism
The Daily Star even wants to recreate the “White Feather Movement”. That’s Pankhursts merry band of bourgeois feminists that would shame men into not fighting in World War 1.
“Yet irrespective of the court’s decision, there remains the possibility of public shame through other means. During World War One, people would brandish white feathers at men in the streets as a symbol of shame for those who declined to take up arms and defend their nation.”

Consider the contrast – Russia’s revolution started by women taking up the cry of bread and the demand to the end of their men dying in World War 1.
Pankhursts “Womens Social And Political Union” (WSPU) suffragettes were all let out of prison in August 1914 so they could shame men into dying in trenches and breathing in mustard gas for one of the worst instances of mechanised mass slaughter the world ever saw.
The initial campaign was launched by a Royal Navy admiral who was inspired by the 1902 novel, The Four White Feathers, where the protagonist receives four white feathers as a symbol of his cowardice when he resigned from the Armed Forces and tried to leave the Sudan conflict and return home.
“A decade after its publication, an individual called Admiral Charles Penrose Fitzgerald would draw on its imagery in order to launch a campaign aimed at increasing army recruitment, thus leading to the use of the white feather in a public sphere at the outbreak of the First World War.
“A military man himself, Fitzgerald was a Vice-Admiral who served in the Royal Navy and was a strong advocate of conscription. He was keen to devise a plan which would bolster the numbers of those enlisting to ensure that all able-bodied men would fulfil their duty to fight.”2
After releasing the suffragettes from prison he organised them to hand out feathers to men refusing to serve in one of the most moronic conflicts to ever happen. The shaming worked. Bereaved families would oft lay the blame at the feminists – puppets of the Imperialist war machine and global Capitalism. Though they occasionally backfired.
“More often than not, many of the women also misjudged their targets, with many men who were on leave from service being handed a white feather. One such anecdote came from a man called Private Ernest Atkins who had returned on leave from the Western Front only to be handed a feather on a tram. Disgusted by this public insult he slapped the woman and said that the boys in Passchendaele would like to see such a feather.”3
For the most part the bourgeois feminists were shameless. Even targeting men injured in the war such as army veteran Reuben W Farrow who lost a hand after being on the end of a bomb at the front.
The Feminist-imperialists were so aggressive in their campaigning they were routinely harassing returning soldiers by 1916. The government decided to hand out a silver medal to counteract the White Feather movement they were directly behind.

US Imperialisms Long History of Trying to Break Ukraine Away From Russia
The real history of the Ukraine war is an entirely provoked war by using a Cosmopolitan emigre group (Ukrainian Fascists) to rip Ukraine out of Russia’s sphere of influence and return Russia to a regional rather than World Power. The concept of ripping Ukraine from Russia was marked explicitly in Zbigniew Brizinki’s book The Grand Chessboard.
“Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard, is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire. Russia without Ukraine can still strive for imperial status, but it would then become a predominantly Asian imperial state, more likely to be drawn into debilitating conflicts with aroused Central Asians, who would then be resentful of the loss of their recent independence and would be supported by their fellow Islamic states to the south. China would also be likely to oppose any restoration of Russian domination over Central Asia, given its increasing interest in the newly independent states there. However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as its access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia. Ukraine’s loss of independence would have immediate consequences for Central Europe, transforming Poland into the geopolitical pivot on the eastern frontier of a united Europe.”4
Though the plan to rip Ukraine away from Russia was fomented a lot longer than that. Both the CIA and Mi6 were cultivating the fascist and Nazi aligned Banderites during World War 2.
Consider Operation Aerodynamic
“The purpose of Project AERODYNAMIC is to provide for the exploitation and expansion of the Anti-Soviet Ukrainian resistance movement for cold war and hot war purposes. Such groups as the Ukrainian Supreme Council of Liberation (UHVR), its military adjunct, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN all in the Ukraine, the Foreign Representation of the Supreme Council of Liberation (ZPUHVR) in Western Europe and the United States, and other Ukrainian organizations such as the Foreign Sections of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (ZchOUN), etc., will be utilized.”5
This more or less mirrored Operation Cyclone when the CIA funded Islamic extremists against the Soviet Union. Both the Ukrainian Fascists and the Muhajadeen (who would eventually become Al Qaeda) were head chopping butchers willing to murder anyone for transnational Capital. The CIA’s favourite alliances.
If they were to successfully dislodge Russia from Ukraine and reduce Russia to a regional power as Brzezinski describes it is not at all far fetched to reckon that the USA would later invade Ukraine under pretexts that a Fascist Ukraine was “contrary to American values”.
Much as they have done with Al Qaeda and ISIS – two groups setup by the United States. It is not for nothing that ISIS has never attacked the Zionist psycho state in the Middle East or that the USA and Britain helped an ex-head of Al Qaeda come to power in Syria.
REFERENCES
1 www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/private-lives/yourcountry/overview/conscriptionww2/
2 https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/White-Feather-Movement/
3 ibid
4 Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard, p24-25
5 https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/AERODYNAMIC%20%20%20VOL.%201_0113.pdf
LEAVE A COMMENT AND SHARE THE POST!