As I turned on the debate I flicked to a different tab in my browser and was listening to the first speaker. When I flicked back to the tab I was shocked to see the first speaker was a man and not a woman.
You may think I am being facetious or adding this in for comedic effect or to insult the speaker.
But this genuinely happened.
I listened to this pathetic weasel insist on a war – that he or his family would never fight discuss what would amount to forced conscription in Britain. Perhaps one of the top comments on the video expresses it best.
“It’s the hand-on-hip posturing, the phoney drama-school theatrics, calling for war while swimming in a suit two sizes too big with a voice yet to break, that make this even more cringe.”
I then listened to the second speaker, a foreigner from Ukraine, insist that we had to fight war with Russia.
Interestingly this Banderite devoted a significant amount of time to “women’s rights” and urged for more female representation on the panels. The implication that women would be more pro war?
How about give British Working-Class women representation on that panel. Instead of foreigners demanding we fight their wars for their ethnic grievance against Russians.
Given the motion in this debate was “This house would rather Go To War With Russians Than Lose Ukraine”.
The motion itself is not specific, perhaps deliberately.
Are the debaters in the Oxford Debate club the ones going to war? It would certainly be funny to see the fishwife (first “male” speaker) and the dolled up Ukrainian climbing through trenches crawling with drones to determine which side Kramatorsk is on.
But we know these prostitutes of the imperialists would never willingly put their own lives on the line.
So the motion can only mean Britain going to war with Russia.
In all reality we are already at war with Russia. The effective drone attacks against Russian oil refineries were likely British/NATO drones. Long range missiles supplied by Britain have killed innocent people in Russia. Europe seems desperate to re-enact it’s once a century tragedy by wanting to invade Russia and parcel up the country. Only to be beaten back in disgrace.
As Napolean was.
Then the Hitlerites.
At great cost to the Soviet people was the Red Flag raised over the Reichstagg.
The imperialists seem to want to move a total war footing though. This will not be like World War 2 whereby a formal declaration of war happens and there is a call up. It’ll happen in a concentric circles of waves of mobilisation as it happened in Ukraine.
I understand why the imperialists want a war – I do.
Their child-raping sociopaths for a start, as the Epstein files proved.
Secondly, without the partition of Russia and a new “Yeltsin era” Capitalism is going to crash and crash hard in imperialist societies.
They had hoped to banish class warfare by offshoring manufacturing and constantly lowering the wages via streams of mass migration – all funded and organised by the British State, American NGO networks and it’s intelligence arms.
Labour power is a commodity.
By flooding labour power into the country they can rest easy at next to no Class Warfare whilst crashing wages to a ridiculously low level.
A level where automation and robotics should have taken those jobs. Many people see the Deliveroo drivers riding their bikes to deliver food to people in Finance, Real Estate or Insurance: sectors that don’t produce anything. Those jobs should simply not exist. They are pure unproductive work and parasitism.
It is a similar process that led to the fall of the Eastern Bloc. Socialism can never “gift” you the commodities of slave labour. Bananas, avocados and fruits picked by children in South America. Chocolate picked by African children. High technology – phones, laptops, smart watches etc mined by slave labour in the Congo.
The Eastern Bloc brought down their socialist governments and destroyed their nations to get passports to the West where they could work as whores, Lumpen Proletariat, gangsters and the advanced detachment of Capitalism.
How else can you explain the depopulation of the former socialist nations?
Try find a single ex-socialist country that bucks the trend that socialism created human beings and built up their nations whilst Capitalist-Imperialism depleted their nations and turned them into a vast reserve army of Labour.
Which was led by a servile, spineless Middle Class who only thought about themselves and what they could get.
How Would They Get Britons To Fight This War Against Russia?
The British State smuggled thousands of Afghans into Britain. It was initially kept secret from the British people and then a super injunction applied against it.
“Details of the major data breach, the response and the number of Afghans granted the right to live in the UK as a result only came to light on Tuesday after a High Court judge ruled, external the gagging order should be lifted.”2
These Afghans are quite literally the scum of the earth. The only people to collaborate with NATO were paedophiles and heroin dealers. People might want to go back and watch “This Is What Winning Looks Like” where they can see a British Lieutenant discussing with the Afghans NATO was arming and training talking about raping little boys. The Taliban came to power on the back of the popular power against the revulsion of Bacha Basi (Child Rape).
Both in the 1990s and again in the 2000s and 2010s.
The United States/NATO was happy to turn a blind eye to this child rape.
The United States has long known about the prevalence of bacha bazi among its partners in the ANSF. It is clear that the U.S. Department of Defense was aware, by 2009 at the latest, of coercive relationships between men and boys on U.S. military bases in Afghanistan. Billions of dollars were spent in order to ensure that the partnership between U.S. forces and ANSF had sufficient capacity to manage and maintain the internal security throughout Afghanistan. In the development of a security sector assistance plan, the U.S. overlooked multiple instances of criminal activity and gross human rights violations, including the sexual abuse of children on military bases.
The rampant nature of bacha bazi in some regions risked the legitimacy of the Afghan government in the eyes of Afghan civilians and undermines Washington’s reputation and that of America’s multilateral international partners. This will have long-term impacts well after the United States has completed its troop drawdown. Over the decades of the American military presence in Afghanistan, the U.S. has continuously turned a blind eye to the ANSF’s and Northern Alliance’s insistence that the current iteration of bacha bazi is Afghan culture, when in reality these groups are co-opting a historical practice in order to traffic and sexually abuse vulnerable Afghan boys. The continued and unquestioned support of the ANSF puts at risk long-term goals for stability and peace in Afghanistan, which the U.S. should continue to emphasize through foreign aid.3
The US imperialists are such revoltingly depraved people the US Army actually punished its own soldiers for complaining about the Afghan-NATO collaborators raping children!
Bacha bazi, which translates as “boy play,” is a form of child sexual abuse that has been reported amongAfghanistan’s military and defense forces. While there is no clear legal definition of the term, a DOD InspectorGeneral report from 2017 describes bacha bazi as the practice of men sexually abusing boys who are trained to dance in girls’ clothing. This type of abuse is said to have a long history in Central Asia, and some who practice it report seeing it as a sign of social status, but Afghan society at large reportedly disapproves strongly. The Taliban strongly oppose bacha bazi (despite their own use of children for frontline fighting), and had largely eradicated it when they controlled the country. A former Marine who had served in Afghanistan noted that the Taliban have used reports of rapes committed by government agents as a recruiting tool. The current Afghan government, after initially failing to address bacha bazi, has pledged to tackle the problem.33 The Department of State’s 2018 Trafficking in Persons report credits the Ghani Government with some strides toward criminalizing bacha bazi and enforcing those laws, but the practice continues to be widespread.
This issue attracted significant congressional concern after the New York Times reported in 2015 that U.S. soldiers serving in Afghanistan were being punished for protesting against the sexual abuse of boys on military bases.35
Some Members intervened on behalf of several individual soldiers, and 93 Members asked SIGAR to investigate the problem and the enforcement of Leahy Laws in Afghanistan. The resulting SIGAR report and a subsequent report by the DOD Inspector General documented an ongoing problem, including a lack of clear guidance for U.S. forces to report and counter cases of abuse.36 Moreover, some Afghan units receive U.S. assistance despite committing “gross violation of human rights,” because of the “notwithstanding clause” that allows for exceptions to the Leahy Laws, and because of procedural flaws in the way Leahy Laws are managed in Afghanistan.4
From Child Rapists heroin dealers in Afghanistan to the Banderite organ harvesters in Ukraine – NATO finds the most despicable people to wage its wars.
When NATO packed up its bags and left Afghanistan the ghost army it had trained and funded disappeared into smoke and the Taliban took back Afghanistan with little to no fight.
The people clinging to the aeroplanes trying to leave Afghanistan with the Americans were the paedophiles, gangsters and drug dealers that NATO had put into power to run the Afghan State. They knew a fate worse than death (deserved, in my opinion) awaited them.
These drugdealing, pederast Afghans were secretly let into Britain under the Ministry of the Defence.5
Why are they here?
If the parasites that rule Britain were to call up conscription, would anyone answer? The answer from the native British population is; unlikely.
So is British Capitalism outfitting itself a mercenary army, shock troops to beat a non-compliant British working class into dying in a trench for transnational global capitalism?
In Ukraine they used the fanaticism of the Banderites to kidnap people off the streets and take them to the front whereby their life expectancy was reduced to one week.6
British Nationalism developed in a more peculiar way given the history of the British Empire. Whereby nationalism was transformed into a transnational global empire. Nationalism until the end of World War 2 was more or less for the Empire.
Ie. a Globalised Cosmopolitan identity rather than a nation – a people’s on a territory with a shared language, culture, historical mythos and economic life.
Since World War 2 the imperialists – led largely by the British – have advanced a serious attack on Nationalism viewing nationalism as a barrier to Capitals extreme rule.
Viewing people who recognise they live in a territory, share an economic life, share a language, culture and shared history as a barrier to their profits the British State has gone about dismantling historical education of Britain and attempting to Americanise the country into a “we’re all migrants” framework.
Whilst at the same time trying to push Britain into the European Union which demands free movement of Capital and free movement of Labour (so the bosses have a constant stream of reserve army of labour).
The aim is to deny everybody everywhere a rooted place to call home where they might make demands of local industry, local culture against the homogenising slop passed around the world through the fetid, rotting corpse of HollyWood. To turn the entire world into rootless cosmopolitans not attached to anything or anywhere. Scrabbling from one economic zone to the next, begging to be exploited for their labour.
An organised Working Class cannot exist in these conditions and that is why free movement of labour is reactionary despite the howling of the Trotskyites!
My point here is that the British State cannot use a faction of British Nationalists to beat their own people into vans to be taken to a frontline.
The British State will almost certainly rely on a mercenary army that is being built right under British peoples noses and that they’re currently paying for. Consider this absurd Independent report where migrants were being moved into military barracks whilst at the same time costing more than the hotels they were put up in.7
Our Troto-Liberal “left” – the Left flank of imperialism – insist that anyone questioning migration is “racist” or “fascist”.
We should instead hang signs of “Refugees Welcome” and let the bosses and Capitalist pigs who want to do away with our nations, and people rooted in community and allow floods of scab labour into the country to ensure the price of Labour is rock bottom and they can never organise along union lines.
Why else does the EU enshrine the free movement of labour? Why else did the Club of Rome, a reactionary Conservative conglomeration of imperialist whos arch reactionary views are best described as fascist, divide the world into economic zones as far back as the 1950sand 1960s?
Programs we can now recognise in the North American Union, the Economic Union, The Eurasian Union etc.
When you are being beaten into a van to advance transnational capital and protect Blackrocks investments in Ukraine, you will do well to remember the faces of those that demanded war and those that pushed for war.
The enemy is at home not abroad!
1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t8uqH6OVhI
2BBC, Thousands of Afghans were moved to UK in secret scheme after data breach, 15 Jul 2025
3New Lines Institute, What About the Boys: A Gendered Analysis of the U.S. Withdrawal and Bacha Bazi in Afghanistan, 06/24/2021, https://newlinesinstitute.org/gender-peace-security/what-about-the-boys-a-gendered-analysis-of-the-u-s-withdrawal-and-bacha-bazi-in-afghanistan/
4https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL30588
5BBC, Thousands of Afghans were moved to UK in secret scheme after data breach, 15 July 2025
6An example of this brutality is https://www.youtube.com/shorts/imXtr8Obcis
7“The government has admitted that plans to move hundreds of asylum seekers into military barracks are part of a bid to appease the public but might not save the taxpayer any money.
“The Home Office has confirmed that Crowborough Training Camp in East Sussex and Cameron Barracks in Inverness will be used temporarily to house a total of around 900 men as ministers scramble to find a way to end migrant hotels after huge controversy surrounding their use.
“But Downing Street has signalled that spending on the plan could prove to be higher than housing migrants in hotels, just one day after MPs on an influential committee described the use of such hotels as “failed, chaotic and expensive”.” Independent, Plans to end asylum hotels ‘won’t save any money’, 28 Oct 2025,
